Back to Top
Religion, Human Rights, and the Workplace: Judicial Balancing in the United States Federal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights
Comparing United States Federal courts' approach to free exercise in the workplace with that of the European Court of Human Rights, this book explores two different methodologies for adjudicating rights conflicts. It argues that while the European approach has flaws, its proportionality approach may offer vital lessons for United States practice.
| Author(s) | By Gregory Mose. |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Format | Hardback |
| Pages | 276 |
| Published in | United Kingdom |
| Published | 4 Aug 2023 |
| Availability | POD |
Comparing United States Federal courts' approach to free exercise in the workplace with that of the European Court of Human Rights, this book explores two different methodologies for adjudicating rights conflicts. It argues that while the European approach has flaws, its proportionality approach may offer vital lessons for United States practice.
Table of cases Acknowledgments Introduction: two traditions of balancing rights PART I Freedom of religion in the United States and the European Court of Human Rights 1 The first freedom: religious free exercise in US federal courts
Gregory Mose is a professor of international law and politics at the American College of the Mediterranean in Aix-en-Provence, France.
