Back to Top
Judicial Dis-Appointments: Judicial Appointments Reform and the Rise of European Judicial Independence
In 2009 and 2010, the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights underwent reforms to their judicial appointments processes, with the result that many of the candidates proposed by Member State governments were rejected. This book examines the rationale behind these reforms from the point of view of the Member States.
| Author(s) | By Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser. |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Format | Hardback |
| Pages | 480 |
| Published in | United Kingdom |
| Published | 8 Oct 2020 |
| Availability | Available |
In 2009 and 2010, the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights underwent reforms to their judicial appointments processes, with the result that many of the candidates proposed by Member State governments were rejected. This book examines the rationale behind these reforms from the point of view of the Member States.
1: Introduction Part I: The New Appointment Processes of the ECJ: The 255 Panel 2: The Prehistory and History of the 255 Panel 3: The 255 Panel in Operation Part II: The New Appointment Processes Of the ECtHR: The APE 4: The Prehistory and History
Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser is the Jack G. Clarke Professor of Law, Director of Graduate Studies, and co-directs the Cornell Summer Institute of International and Comparative Law in Paris. He teaches and writes in the areas of comparative law, law of the
